The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict might destabilise the entire Eurasian region
Kavkaz Files ISSN 2975-0474 Volume 2 Issue 1
Author: Giuliano Bifolchi
The Caucasus might become the theatre of a new Nagorno-Karabakh conflict whose consequences will impact the entire Eurasian region if the international community does not stop the military escalation at the borders of the de-facto Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan.
Since yesterday morning Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijani forces have been fighting each other along the borders in a new escalation which might be interpreted as the epilogue of a long summer of small military operations, border clashes, and political propaganda. Actually, during the entire summer, Armenia and Azerbaijan have accused each other of creating the conditions for a new war, especially after the Armenian and Azerbaijani military forces clashed in the area of Tavush the last July.
According to the Armenian sources and Stepanakert’s official statement, on the morning of the 27th of November 2020, the Azerbaijani army launched a military offensive along the contact line shelling Nagorno-Karabakh’s soldiers with heavy artillery.
The Armenian side also accused Azerbaijan of targetting Nagorno-Karabakh’s capital, Stepanakert, posing a serious threat to the local civilians. Nagorno-Karabakh’s government reported that its military force shot down two Azerbaijani helicopters and three drones and destroyed several tanks.
The Armenian Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinian, imposed martial law and the general mobilisation asking his people ‘to be ready to defend the motherland’.
The Azerbaijani side confirmed the destruction of one of its helicopters. However, Baku stated that all the soldiers survived after completing their mission of destroying several Armenian anti-aircraft batteries. The Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev accused the Armenian government of undermining the peace talks. During these years of attempted dialogue, Yerevan has deployed tens of thousands of soldiers at the Nagorno-Karabakh borders intending to attack the Azerbaijani military forces.
The Head of the presidential Foreign Affairs Department, Hikmet Hajiyev, stated that Armenia deliberately bombed Azerbaijani civilians who live near the conflict zone causing civilian and military victims and destroying several public buildings and infrastructures. What is happening now at the borders, according to Baku, could be easily forecasted considering that the Armenian strategy of deploying its soldiers in Nagorno-Karabakh is the first reason of the peace process’ failure and regional instability.
As always, it is impossible to determine which side started the fight because Armenia/Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan accuse the enemy of breaking the cease-fire. This is a classical modus operandi which had characterised the ‘frozen conflict’ in Nagorno-Karabakh since 1994 when Armenia and Azerbaijan signed the cease-fire and accepted to be involved in the peace process under the supervision of the OSCE Minsk Group.
Geopolitical scenario of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
The general mobilisation followed the escalation at the borders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, a prologue to the war which might destabilise the entire Caucasus involving regional and international key players. Actually, although both Baku and Yerevan were involved in the peace process, for years, Armenia and Azerbaijan have spent a significant part of their state budget on buying military equipment, hardware and weapons and being ready for a possible conflict.
Turkey is directly involved in the Caucasus, and Ankara has always supported Baku in the fight against Yerevan. Turkish implication in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict underlines Ankara’s foreign policy of controlling the Caucasus which is considered a ‘bridge’ between Europe and Asia and an energetic and logistic hub.
Russia plays a primary role in this ‘frozen conflict’ because the Kremlin considers the Caucasus part of its lebensraum (vital space), where the Russian government wants to impose its political and economic influence in the confrontation against the West, especially after the Russo – Georgian War (2008) and the Ukrainian Crisis (2014). Furthermore, Armenia is a member of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Kremlin’s organisation whose goal is to create an ‘economic alliance’ which has often been interpreted as an alter ego of the European Union and an obstacle for the EU Eastern Partnership.
Moreover, the Kremlin has a military base in Gyumri (Armenia) as part of its Transcaucasian Group of Forces. As the map shows, the base is close to the Armenian-Turkish borders, preventing possible Turkish involvement in a regional conflict. In 2019 Russia reinforced the base, numbering up to 5,000 soldiers with helicopter gunships and other military hardware since a 2010 Russian-Armenian agreement extended its basing rights in Armenia to 2044.
In a possible future scenario, if Turkey decides to support Azerbaijan in its military operations against Armenia actively, the presence of the Russian military base of Gyumri might deter Turkish military operations or become another trigger point of a broader conflict which will involve Moscow and Ankara, whose diplomatic relations have been fluctuating since the Kremlin’s military support to Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
Conflict in the South Caucasus also undermines the EU interests in the region. In fact, Bruxelles has individuated the Caucasus, especially Azerbaijan, as the market where it is possible to import oil and natural gas to support its Energy Security Strategy, whose main goal is to decrease the dependence on Russian energy export. Italy is a vital actor in the EU Energy Security Strategy because in the south of the country (Apulia) is the last terminal where Azerbaijan will export through the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) its natural gas extracted from the Caspian field of Shah Deniz.
Moreover, the entire Caucasus is part of the EU Eastern Partnership, which aims at strengthening and deepening the political and economic relations between the EU, its Member States and the partner countries and supports sustainable reform processes in partner countries.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we might state that, looking at the official statement released by the Armenian and the Azerbaijani governments and politicians, the conflict seems inevitable because both Baku and Yerevan have spent considerable money to modernise and implement their military capabilities.
The international community should stop the conflict to avoid a geopolitical and humanitarian crisis. A new conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan can have catastrophic consequences because the Caucasus plays a fundamental role in the Eurasian geopolitical chessboard where foreign actors such as Turkey, Russia, the European Union, the entire West and also the near Iran (Tehran has an alternate foreign policy with Baku because although Iran shares a common historical, religious, and cultural background with Azerbaijan, the Iranian leadership suspiciously sees the Azerbaijani-Israeli relations and has established a commercial partnership with Armenia) are challenging each other to affirm their supremacy inside the international arena.
Do you like SpecialEurasia reports and analyses? Has our groundbreaking research empowered you or your team? Now is your chance to be a part of our mission! Join us in advancing independent reporting and unlocking the secrets of Eurasia’s complex geopolitical landscape. Whether through a one-time contribution or a monthly/yearly donation, your support will fuel our relentless pursuit of knowledge and understanding. Together, let’s pave the way for a brighter future. DONATE NOW and secure your place in shaping the geopolitical narrative.