Ukraine conflict and Western Sanctions against Moscow: Analysis of Russian Efforts to Repatriate Frozen Assets in 2024

Ukraine conflict and Western Sanctions against Moscow: Analysis of Russian Efforts to Repatriate Frozen Assets in 2024_SpecialEurasia

Geopolitical Report ISSN 2785-2598 Volume 51 Issue 13
SpecialEurasia OSINT Unit

Executive Summary

In 2024, Russia successfully recovered approximately 570 billion rubles ($6.3 billion) in assets previously frozen by Western nations because of the ongoing geopolitical conflict. Mechanisms involving exchanges of frozen assets and payments facilitated this recovery, affecting roughly 1.5 million Russian citizens on foreign securities.

Even with its successes, the substantial amount of Russia’s reserves frozen, primarily in the EU, remains a significant threat to its financial health. Russia’s efforts to unfreeze its assets are a strategic countermeasure to the financial isolation imposed by Western sanctions. Moreover, Russia’s pursuit of further assets will likely involve continued legal and diplomatic efforts.

Background Information

Following Russia’s military actions in Ukraine in 2022, Western nations, particularly the European Union and the G7, imposed extensive sanctions, including the freezing of Russia’s foreign reserves. The EU froze approximately 300 billion euros in Russian assets, mostly held in the Euroclear system. This move was part of a broader strategy to pressure Russia economically. In response, Russia has engaged in efforts to recover these assets, employing various financial mechanisms, including exchanges and payments on frozen securities.

Analysis

In 2024, Russian authorities successfully reclaimed a portion of their frozen assets, totalling 570 billion rubles. These assets primarily involved securities and coupon payments. The Central Bank of Russia and the government supported the recovery process, using mechanisms such as asset exchanges between Russian and foreign investors and payments on foreign securities. The efforts have benefited around 1.5 million Russian citizens whose investments were affected by the sanctions.

However, Russian officials, including Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina, have acknowledged that the broader scale of asset recovery remains limited. A significant portion of Russian assets, particularly over 200 billion euros held in Belgium’s Euroclear system, remain frozen in Europe.

The current situation indicates that Moscow’s financial recovery is both incomplete and uncertain. Despite the mechanisms in place for asset recovery, large-scale schemes for further unfreezing are not under current discussion. This shows that future efforts will probably focus on smaller, targeted financial instruments rather than a comprehensive unfreezing of assets.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s claim that Russia’s frozen assets constitute “theft” highlights the intensifying diplomatic and legal fight over these funds. These developments highlight Russia’s continued reliance on both legal frameworks and alternative financial systems to mitigate the impact of Western sanctions.

Risk Assessment

  1. Risk of Limited Financial Recovery – High. Despite the return of 570 billion rubles, Russia’s total frozen reserves remain largely inaccessible. With ongoing sanctions and Western nations’ hesitation to release frozen Russian assets, the chance of recovering substantial further assets is slim.
  2. Risk of Prolonged Diplomatic Tension – High. The conflict over frozen assets is likely to remain a key point of contention in Russia’s relations with Western nations. This could lead to prolonged diplomatic standoffs and further sanctions, potentially exacerbating Russia’s economic isolation. Conversely, a U.S.-Russia agreement resolving the Ukraine conflict could financially benefit Moscow, particularly by easing sanctions.
  3. Risk of Financial System Fragmentation – Moderate. The Kremlin’s efforts to bypass Western financial systems, including potential reliance on non-Western financial institutions, could lead to fragmentation of global financial markets. This may limit Russia’s access to global liquidity and increase geopolitical risk associated with alternative financial systems.
  4. Risk of Legal Repercussions – Moderate. Legal challenges related to the frozen assets may lead to prolonged litigation and potentially unfavourable rulings for Russia in international courts. The outcome of these cases could have significant financial and geopolitical consequences.

Conclusion

Despite three years of conflict in Ukraine, economic sanctions continue to pressure Russia’s financial system but haven’t yet triggered a domestic crisis that could threaten Putin’s power.

Russia has partially succeeded in unfreezing 570 billion rubles in assets frozen by Western sanctions. However, the broader issue of the frozen 300 billion euros in reserves remains unresolved. Moscow’s diplomatic and legal campaigns are likely to continue, with further efforts focusing on smaller financial instruments and asset exchanges.

Despite Western portrayals of Russia’s isolation, Moscow’s financial and economic alternatives have yielded positive outcomes. While sanctions financially pressured the Kremlin, forcing it to seek alternatives, geopolitically, Moscow expanded its influence and forged alliances with non-Western nations. Future developments in this area will significantly impact Russia’s financial strategy and its wider geopolitical standing.


Read all our reports for the third anniversary of the Ukraine conflict or contact us at info@specialeurasia.com and request our tailored analyses or consulting services on Ukraine and the post-Soviet space.